Participation on Trial

Last September we learnt that Goldsmiths University would no longer be running our MA programme in Participatory Arts. As a group we agreed that we’d like to create a legacy for the course and also open up the debate about the nature of participatory artistic practice.

Last week we staged our event: a Dadaesque mock trial that accused artists, institutions, funders, critics and academia of delivering a version of participatory arts that is little more than an illusion.

Rather than describe the event in detail I’ve attached some links to key witness statements and reviews of the day.  Please remember that this was an event that blurred the boundaries between life and art and approached serious debate in a playful way. Some witnesses were obliged to commit acts of treachery while giving evidence!

Review from Stephen Pritchard-Colouring in Culture

Stephen Pritchard’s statement for the Prosecution

David Slater’s (Entelechy Arts)-statement for the Prosecution

David Jubb’s (Battersea Arts Centre) -statement for the Defence

David Slater (Entelechy Arts) reaction to David Jubb’s speech

Follow Participatory Arts Lab on WordPress and @artsontrial on Twitter to keep up to date with the debate


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s